My Appointment to DC Inter-agency Council on Homelessness
No one who knows me can imagine me feeling a need to be validated by the system. After all, I began advocating in June 2006 -- less than two weeks before the first ever DC ICH meeting. I've been involved with this body for the entirety of its existence thus far, missing very few of the big meetings which used to be bi-monthly but are now quarterly.
However, Kristy Greenwalt became its first director on April 28th, 2014 and is implementing a number of changes -- some for the purpose of bringing the ICH into compliance with new federal regulations. In February 2015 other advocates and I were informed of ICH positions that were being created or becoming open. I made it a point to apply -- which has proven to be a lengthy process. Fast-forward nine months to November 4th, 2015. On this day there was a nomination hearing in front of Council Chairman Phil Mendelson. I was one of 12 applicants who testified. While I'm not sure how many seats were open, I know that only three of the 12 people were either homeless or formerly homeless with the regulations calling for three to five members to be from that category. Someone with inside information called me about two hours after my testimony to tell me that I've been confirmed. I still await the official word, though I'm sure my friend is right. That said, here is the testimony I read which can also be accessed on the DC Council website:
However, Kristy Greenwalt became its first director on April 28th, 2014 and is implementing a number of changes -- some for the purpose of bringing the ICH into compliance with new federal regulations. In February 2015 other advocates and I were informed of ICH positions that were being created or becoming open. I made it a point to apply -- which has proven to be a lengthy process. Fast-forward nine months to November 4th, 2015. On this day there was a nomination hearing in front of Council Chairman Phil Mendelson. I was one of 12 applicants who testified. While I'm not sure how many seats were open, I know that only three of the 12 people were either homeless or formerly homeless with the regulations calling for three to five members to be from that category. Someone with inside information called me about two hours after my testimony to tell me that I've been confirmed. I still await the official word, though I'm sure my friend is right. That said, here is the testimony I read which can also be accessed on the DC Council website:
Eric
Sheptock's ICH Nomination Testimony
Chairman Mendelson and the DC Council:
As you well know, I am Eric Jonathan
Sheptock whom several of you honored on November 18th,
2014 as you declared December 31st, 2014 to be Eric
Jonathan Sheptock Day in the District of Columbia. It was due to my
work from June 2006 to the present fighting for the city's homeless
community. Even with several council members having taken office this
past January and the late Marion Barry's seat having been filled
since then, I know that all but one or two members have met me. It
stands to reason that a body which has so honored me (giving me the
day by which the 2004 plan would have ended homelessness if it had
worked) would appoint me to the DC Inter-agency Council on
Homelessness as a community representative.
With my nine-plus years of advocacy
being well-documented on the internet and accessible through a simple
Google search, I need not belabor the topic of my experience. Even
so, I will indeed point out that I attended the first ever ICH
meeting under the auspices of then-city administrator Robert Bobb as
it was held on the 11th floor of 441 4th street
NW – the Judiciary Square Building – in June 2006. I went to
several of the ICH inaugural hearings which were held in several
locations that are easily accessed by the poor and homeless of the
city. As a matter of fact, I still have a lengthy e-mail document
that spells out what people said at those hearings. That document and
the annual point-in-time count give me multiple points of reference
that I can use to determine how well we are doing at ending
homelessness or even improving the conditions that people must endure
while homeless.
Some might say that my critiques are,
at times, as poignant as those given by the late, great Mitch Snyder.
But anyone who knows me knows that I am a solution-oriented person.
It has been a personal rule of mine for over 25 years that I don't
open my mouth to complain unless I have a possible solution (there
being an obvious exception when I lack the necessary expertise). That
said, I was quite bothered when I heard talk of a second
multiple-year plan without anyone having looked at why “Homelessness
No More” has turned into “Homes No More” since its 2004
passage. I was also quite bothered by the fact that, with the ICH
normally discussing the increase of decrease in homeless people at
the meeting which follows the publishing of the count results, there
was no discussion of the 13%, one-year increase to 7,748 people at
the June 2014 ICH meeting. I dug and got an answer as to why –
another pertinent skill of mine.
It should be noted that I am currently
building the conversation around the future of the Federal City
Shelter also known as CCNV, though I'm not the only one. I was a
significant player in bringing forth the June 27th, 2013
Human Services hearing during which Councilman Graham decided to
create the CCNV Task Force which has led to the creation of
legislation that allows Mayor Bowser to create and move on a plan
that hopefully will improve the lives of the shelter residents. I
filed a FOIA request with the feds in January 2013, sent the info to
Mr. Graham, pressed him every couple of weeks about the promised
hearing and worked with my advocacy colleagues to get the homeless
and concerned citizens involved. I plan to continue this particular
effort; therefore, it behooves the DC Council to appoint me to the
ICH. After all, me being on the ICH causes me to have to “play
nicely in the sandbox”.
Whether I'm poignant or polite, my
dedication to ending homelessness is clearly unwavering. However, my
vision and goals are not defined by what we are ending so much as
what we are beginning and creating. With so many of the advocates
fighting for the disabled and for families, I have made my primary
focus the able-bodied homeless adults – a topic I am speaking on
extensively with a French citizen who is currently working on her
doctoral thesis. That said, I envision a world in which any full-time
worker can afford all of life's necessities without government
assistance – with those who can't work being provided for. This
vision includes but is not limited to affordable-on-the-open-market
housing and requires that all jobs pay a living wage. Let's work
together toward these and similar goals.
Thanks.
Comments